Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Bitter in Ohio: LexisNexis Offshore Outsourcing More White Collar Jobs to India

As part of it's announced strategy to move all possible work out of the United States to India, Reed Elsevier, the Anglo-Dutch publishing giant and parent company of Lexis Nexis continues to eliminate positions at the Dayton, Ohio Lexis Nexis "campus" site. Elsevier and Lexis Nexis white collar workers continue to receive news of job cuts. Occassionally, the news leaks out to the press and then LexisNexis and RE "spokespersons" attempt to minimize the apparent impact, reassuring everyone that displaced workers will receive severence money and placement assistance. The truth is, of course, quite different from the "spin" of corporate public relations specialists...

One correspondent noted,

"Lexis is dumping all of us, all our [work] is now transferred to India.
All of building 8 will be notified and terminated starting June 23
Plus they are laying off an undetermined number from campus, got a bunch last week and more to come.
Only 3 analysts will survive and they will be required to travel to India and spend time training those people."

Of course, severence money and job placement assistance mentioned in the article below is, no doubt, contingent upon employee non-disclosure of offshore outsourcing details and cooperation in facilitating the offshoring to India - i.e., training Indian replacements and transferring knowledge... It is unlikely that the press and the public will ever know the full extent of the job cuts. I also doubt that people will realise that LN will attempt to coerce Americans into traveling to India to train foreign replacement workers.

Even the announced numbers of American workers displaced is deliberately understated. For example, the announced figure of "250" in the article headline below does not reflect the "38" announced (somewhere) last week at the Elsevier group at this Dayton location. The overall numbers of jobs being cut is always (and intentionally) a moving number.

One should anticipate future job cut announcements which when reported in the press, will omit all mention of previous job cuts or the destination of the jobs (India).


As these job cuts at LexisNexis illustrate, politicians, members of the press, "business leaders", and economists continue to misrepresent the nature of the job losses in Ohio and America. American white collar workers continue to lose their middle class jobs due to offshore outsourcing. Unlike the manufacturing jobs, most of these white collar jobs are going to India (facilitated by Indian "guest workers" in the U.S. on "business visas"). The "knowledge age" jobs -- not "industrial" or "manufacturing" or "union" jobs -- throughout Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana and Illinois are going offshore. These are the jobs which Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton assured us were the future in the wake of NAFTA.

I wish the press would move beyond their stereotypes of the midwest and focus on the fact that high tech and other white collar jobs are moving offshore...


Staff Writer

Monday, April 14, 2008

LexisNexis plans to eliminate up to approximately 250 jobs between now and early 2009 at its suburban Dayton campus, according to a company announcement Monday, April 14.

The company disclosed that the information technology division of its parent company, Reed Elsevier, announced plans last week to phase out 38 positions from now through May 10 at the suburban Dayton operation, where about 3,000 people are employed. It is the company's single largest operational site in the United States.

And on Monday, LexisNexis said it will transfer the work of 215 Dayton-area positions to outside suppliers, part of a total of 290 positions whose work will be turned over to outside suppliers between now and early 2009 in order to cut costs.

Those reductions will affect data collection, conversion, editing and business systems operations, LexisNexis said. The cuts are necessary in order for the company to remain competitive and make investments to meet customer demands, management said.

All of the affected employees will receive severance benefits and help finding new jobs, the company said. It is possible that some employees might be redeployed within the company, management said.

"Guided by the long-term needs of our business, we regret that some of our employees will be leaving LexisNexis," Sue D'Agostino, the company's vice president for corporate communications, said in a statement.

Reed Elsevier said in February that it intended to achieve about $481 million in cost savings during the next three years.

The electronic publishing company provides information services to legal, corporate, government and academic customers.

Contact this reporter at (937) 225-2242 or jnolan@DaytonDailyNews.com.

NOTE: The overall numbers of American workers being cut is likely far higher than the "250" noted in this article. 1,000 job outsourcings to India from the Dayton, Ohio location seems likely...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11 Comments:

Blogger Info_Tech_Guy said...

How nice! So, is the work outsourced to India, the Phillippines or somewhere else? Do you guarantee the confidentiality and security of the customer information? How many American jobs has your company successfully moved offshore? I'm sure that your company will be back to offer outsourcing of "core processes" eventually -- or perhaps you work with other outsourcing partners to provide that capability...

Thu Apr 17, 06:40:00 AM EST  
Blogger Citizen Carrie said...

If newspapers are simply going to reprint press releases, it should be clearly disclosed. Newspapers should not attach a reporter's name to a story where the reporter clearly did not put in any effort to find out additional information.

Thu Apr 17, 01:47:00 PM EST  
Blogger Soji B said...

It was a bunch of white people who outsourced jobs. Greedy, white people. When will you all wake up and realize that? White people need to stand up to white people.

Big companies, which are US companies, like HP, IBM, and others have moved thousands of US job overseas, while the rich white CEOs made millions.

Wed Oct 22, 04:12:00 AM EST  
Blogger bineesh said...

Its presentation differ from other sites...
Regards,
accounts outsourcing

Thu Jun 18, 04:59:00 AM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Free online view all job opportunities in India. Employees looking for Naukri Online, and employor looking for best employees and much more

Best regards.
http://www.india-forums.tv/jobs-in-india.html

Tue Dec 08, 04:44:00 AM EST  
Blogger academic said...

Thank you for posting such a useful, impressive and a wicked article./Wow.. looking good!
Data Entry Services

Sat Sep 25, 12:06:00 AM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Stay away from 'Yes men'
It is not hard to find stories of offshore software development firms over-promising and under-delivering. With increasing competition among offshore vendors, some of the companies would go to any length to land contracts. In a desperate attempt to keep up the volume of work, they tend to start telling the clients exactly what the clients want to hear, all the time. They end up saying Yes to everything that comes their way. '
2
Get involved, stay engaged
Some people still think that you can put a bunch of software developers in a room, feed them project specifications, pizza and soda, and the complete product magically appears in a few weeks or month, only to discover upon delivery that project has gone way off-track. Not being passionately involved with your offshore team is a recipe for failure. Your team is not addressing a technology challenge; they are addressing your business challenge using technology. And no one knows your business and your vision better than you.
3
Communication is key
It's easy to underestimate this, but communication failures are the biggest IT project killers; whether they are onsite or offshore. Putting good communication frameworks in place is ever more critical while working with global teams. One of the most important things you should do is to demand a seasoned project manager located offshore who works directly with the developers. This person should manage all communication since developers are not the best communicators and should provide you daily status reports. I
Seychelles company formation

Thu Mar 27, 01:54:00 AM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

A very interesting article. The insights are really helpful and informative. Thanks for posting. IT Offshoring and Outsourcing|Service Level Agreement IndiaTop IT Companies In India

Mon May 25, 06:26:00 AM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

The information which you have provided is really nice and awesome. Provides some very useful insights of how things actually work. I want to share something more about this as well.
With Regards
Digital Marketing Company in Hyderabad
Outsourcing Internet Marketing Services in India

Wed Sep 02, 09:06:00 AM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Thanks for sharing :)

Offshore Software Development Company

Thu Nov 03, 10:39:00 PM EST  
Blogger Selfless said...

Epic's narrative and RPG-like focus isn't a thematic side job or something that the programmer is performing just for fun. Focusing on world-building and fortnite items giving gamers a communal story to rally around is a business imperative for a free-to-play game like Fortnite. The sport can only remain applicable as long as players feel encouraged in what they are doing. That does not just mean playing the competitive multiplayer each day to unlock challenges or attempt to win a game. Being invested in Fortnite also means caring more deeply about what story Epic is attempting to tell, where the game is directed, buy fortnite weapons and the way that interplay between gameplay and narrative can help the title evolve over the years, like only the best of MMOs.

Fri Feb 01, 02:12:00 AM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home

This site is best viewed using the Mozilla Firefox web browser available at http://www.mozilla.com
Firefox 2
This site is neither tested with, nor optimized for, any version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer web browser. As Paul Thurrott commented quite some time ago, "IE isn't secure and isn't standards-compliant, which makes it unworkable both for end users and Web content creators." (See, for example, "Internet Explorer Unsafe for 284 Days in 2006" at "Security Fix" on WashingtonPost.com)

Boycott IE